Posts Tagged ‘indepth’

Castaway On The Moon: Isolation, Jajangmyeon, & Hikikomoris

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009 by Crap

castaway on the moonLets face it, Korean cinema has been far from impressive of late. Especially when we put things in contrast to earlier this very same decade that saw an emerging new generation that inventively crafted genre films capable of drawing huge international markets. Whether it was Park Chan Wook, Bong Joon Ho, or Kim Ki Duk, it was obvious that there was a shifting paradigm away from the more classical mentalities of old blood like Im Kwon-taek or even the monotonous flood of mainstream romance comedies or period films on the other side of the spectrum.

Overall, films that were both commercially viable and critically successful on a global scale were becoming increasingly more likely. This was in direct contrast and often times in conflict with a parallel trend that was heavily aimed at drawing in domestic tween markets, with embarrassingly sappy melodramatic fare that was often times both formulaic and utterly mindless. Unsurprisingly, this latter trend won out and the emergence of this domestic innovation seemed to disappear altogether. Park Chan Wook and his contemporaries were still pumping out yearly works for the festival circuit, but it didn’t appear that anyone new was entering the limelight.

Its quite a sad affair and one that has honestly decreased my personal attentions to Korean film making on the whole. Thus I watch less films as years pass and pay increasingly less attention to industry developments. This isn’t to say I’ve completely given up on them but merely that my attentions are focused elsewhere on the globe. I still catch the new Kim Ki Duk or Park film when the opportunity presents itself. And on some rare occasions, still catch that oddball film that may have peaked my interest via a blog post or blind rental. Castaway on the Moon is such a film and one that I viewed wholly by accident.

A look at “Take Out”

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009 by Crap

take out film

In the tradition of both cinéma vérité and Italian neorealist style, it seems that the central image of the bicycle within a bleak urbanized environment has become somewhat of a motif. Dating back to De Sica’s classic Bicycle Thieves and popping up more recently in Sixth Generation director Wang Xiaoshuai’s Beijing Bicycle, it has once again seemingly appeared in Sean Baker and Shih-Ching Tsou’s social realist work, Take Out.

To not rely heavily upon comparative analysis, I’ll be brief. The continuing motif is obvious but probably irrelevant for the most part. Take Out has little to nothing to do with De Sica’s earlier work aside from genre and narrative similarities. If anything, it bears more in common with its Sixth Generation contemporaries across the globe such as Li Yang’s Blind Shaft or possibly Lou Ye’s Suzhou River.

In this manner there is a deep interest in its almost transnational cinematic relationship that seemingly parallels the subject matter of the film. Ming Ding, an illegal Chinese immigrant like most of the characters on screen, is struggling to not only earn a living, but save enough money to send back home to his awaiting family. His supposed frustration over this difficulty leads to borrowing money from a loan shark that he simply can’t pay back.

A look at “The Last Lullaby”

Saturday, August 29th, 2009 by Crap

the last lullaby

On The Last Lullaby, Jeffrey Goodman in a manifesto-like statement expressed his desires to stray away from modern cinematic norms and trends. He called for a seemingly nostalgic return to when film actually mirrored its society in a relevant fashion. Its an honest sentiment and one that I find both intriguing and troubling. On the one hand, looking back through the eyes of history one can easily associate periods of time with cultural artifacts such as film in this context. But the trouble I see is whether or not this is indeed simply “nostalgia” at work or possibly the presence of a larger historical scope to look back on.

Its hard to say whether or not cinema for better or worse, does or does not mirror our own contemporary society today. Surely film has indeed become somehow more rapid, sporadic, and pointlessly styled with little forethought. But it is hard to state whether this is not somehow indicative of our modern perceptions in a more holistic context. Life and temporal perception have indeed become more rushed, mechanized, and rather chaotic thus possibly for better or worse, film has still retained a certain accuracy in social reflection.

Regardless, Goodman does indeed make a great effort to stray away from huge Box office hitters like 300 or Crank which literally bombarded the viewer with an almost orgy-astic attack of excess. The Last Lullaby is anything but, and is indeed a refreshing diversion away from the over stimulation of these recent films. Goodman’s debut is if anything, a refreshing break from the quite literally tiresome fare at the box office of recent years characterized largely by senseless visual style.

Au Revoir, Les Enfants: Looking Through the Glass, Reflection & Opacity

Friday, August 21st, 2009 by Crap

au revoir les enfants

Au Revoir, Les Enfants is a semi-autobiographical, fictionalized account of Malle’s own childhood experiences during Nazi occupation.  The title translated into English, “Goodbye Children” refers both to the tragic departing at narrative’s end, as well as the general loss of innocence that accompanies an adolescent’s transition into adulthood.  Overall its quite a beautiful yet heartbreaking piece of cinema.  Dealing largely with the war yet almost ignoring its presence onscreen, it instead utilizes the microcosm of a small boys Catholic school to showcase the grander effects of the miserable conflict outside.

The film focuses largely on Julien Quentin, Malle’s own surrogate whom is often set in moral ambiguity among his peers.  Opposite him is the seemingly mysterious newcomer Bonnet, later revealed to be a Jew in hiding.  While one could easily spend a good deal of time discussing the emotional and humanistic impact of Malle’s personal work, I find that this would be quite redundant.  For one, its a given and has been contextualized by many sources to death.  Instead I will focus on a particular visual motif that caught my interest and was cleverly utilized cinematically, to add depth to this already impressive film.

Big Trouble In Little China: Oriental Absurdity and Transnationalism

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009 by Crap

big trouble in little china

John Carpenter has been and always will be a familiar name to cinephiles and even the casual movie-goer. Often times he has been conveniently placed into the confining label of a cult director who gets his chops from making senseless B-grade entertainment. Films known more for their outlandish style, one-liners, and quirky characters more so then any semblance of artistic merit, auteurship, or clever commentary.

Though for any individual with half a brain, this couldn’t be further from the truth. Films such as Halloween or The Thing held such artistry and weight behind them, that even today they have been burned into the cultural psyche as everlasting memes. Even cult favorites such as They Live abundant with its nonsensical one liners like “I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass… and I’m all out of bubblegum” are still popularly remembered for its blatant social commentaries.

Regardless, there has always been one film that stood out in Carpenter’s prolific filmography, and the very one that established the man as a true auteur in my book but has often been sadly misrepresented. Big Trouble In Little China has if anything, remained as a cultural meme more for its laughable absurdity and seemingly offensive portrayal of Chinese culture. The sad fact of the matter is, I found myself confronted more then once in college by scholarship that hammered in the idea that Big Trouble was part of a huge consortium or succession of film that relegated Asian culture to mere exoticism. Films like The Golden Child, Breakfast at Tiffany’s, and First Yank into Tokyo for example, made liberal use of this orientalism and a tradition of yellowface.

Big Trouble In Little China on the other hand, could arguably be one of the greatest films to confront this misrepresentation of Asian culture and provide highly relevant criticism of US policies in context to an ever increasing transnationalist playing field. A sense of globalism and border breakdown which is ever so present today, especially in the face of a dwindling US economy, and an ever increasing China superpower.

Ugetsu: A look at National Allegory & Post-Showa Criticism

Friday, May 15th, 2009 by Crap

ugetsu

This is the first in hopefully a long-going series for The Cineastes. As this is the first time we have done this, there is a lack of groundwork, tradition, or guidelines in place. Thus I personally took this opportunity to do a more holistic and brief look into the film chosen. Its not very well organized nor is it centralized into a singular theme. More so, it is in essence the notes and thoughts I gathered while watching the film put to paper.

The jist is, I touch upon a variety of things below but refrain from going into large detail. Thus its largely more informative and speculative then actually formulating conclusions based upon internal discourse. I’ve also interspersed screencaps of key frames I discuss as well as a spew of wikipedia links for further information. Of course, clicking them is optional but recommended if the topic at hand is wholly unfamiliar.

Lastly, be sure to check out the bottom of this entry to find out what the rest of the Cineastes had to say about Ugetsu.

Let The Right One In: Violence, Androgyny, & Impressionability

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009 by Crap

Let The Right One In

Last night, I finally got around to viewing Let The Right One In, a Swedish film that got hugely popularized around the time of the larger global release of Twilight. While its fairly safe to say both works can be placed on opposite sides of a particular spectrum, both works indeed center around vampirism, a subsequent adolescent romance, and a release in the Fall of last year. Many critics cited the former Swedish release in retaliation to the overly promoted Twilight based upon a generic young adult novel series as well as starring some teen heart-throbs. While the latter work focuses more on a simple teen romance and the element of supernatural fantasy as spectacle, Let The Right One In merely uses vampirism as a narrative device to elicit questions of morality, violence, and androgynous identity.

A large portion of the viewers criticized the film for its seemingly pastiche “underdog getting bullied” setup that finds resolution through romance, or physical retaliation. While on the surface this seems valid, when one realizes the obvious moral ambiguity surrounding the main character dynamic, it seems somewhat illogical. If anything, it seems the pastiche is being used purposely to offer a critique or satire. By film’s end, both Oskar and Eli have committed violent acts that are ethically wrong but seem to go ignored. Eli kills countless victims and Oskar assists in this outcome several times. What is interesting is how the film successfully sets up the characters in a way in which the audience comes to naturally associate with Oskar and Eli on an emotional level. Their romance is childlike and seemingly innocent but presents a moral dilemma. Viewers easily ignore the violence in the narrative because they sympathize with Oskar and Eli almost wanting them to succeed. The way in which the violence is portrayed on screen parallels this notion, almost all the violent acts happen off screen or in the shadows. The viewer knows the extent of the gruesome acts yet is allowed to keep a distance.

The Dilemma of a Perceived Male Fantasy in Whedon’s Dollhouse

Saturday, February 21st, 2009 by Crap

Dollhouse TV Episode 2

In the past, one of the more intriguing aspects of Joss Whedon’s output has been his explicit representations of extremely literal antagonistic forces exemplifying forces of familial tensions, teen angst, and standardized gender misrepresentation. Whedon’s Buffy was notorious for its monster-of-the-week formula which quite often employed a literal monster as a manifestation of the characters’ tensions and conflicts. While Whedon has indeed spoken of distancing this current project from his former works, it seems this is one thing he hasn’t abandoned.

Despite many current viewers suspicions’ on whether or not the formula of Dollhouse can prove to be a successful and viable form of serialized television, one must discount the popular claim beforehand that the plot set-up presented in the show would only serve as a perverse male fantasy. These claims and suspicions were not completely unfounded. The initial trailer for the show as well as the banners Fox was implementing in its promotion seemed to only sexualize Dushku by displaying her naked and sideways hourglass form overlayed across the bottom of the screen during many of their other prime-time shows. It was indeed somewhat suspect and off-putting, but Whedon and those actually part of the creative force often have little control or input into how their work is ultimately advertised.

Regardless, the premise of Dollhouse on a synoptic basis seems to go against Whedon’s earlier mold of strong female leads exemplified quite literally and simply in their ability to physically fight off antagonistic forces. Even those that were not in lead roles seemed to always develop into pivotal and active characters who served as complex narrative subjects in their own context, rather than simply a catalyst for the further development of a lead. Such early examples could be seen with Willow from Buffy who went from a seemingly stereotypical timid bookworm to a powerful witch who played a much more prominent role as the seasons progressed with the penultimate season being largely centered around her new developments. Likewise, Cordelia Chase similarly shifted from one side of a spectrum to the other by going from a superficial and vain cheerleader to an almost sacrificial hero by the end of Angel. In Dollhouse on the other hand, it seemed that the lead of Echo (Eliza Dushku) would largely be inactive and simply a passive receiver of others’ actions. Whether or not this is the case, the set-up of a Doll who loses her memory, personality, and individuality for the benefit of others seems to only offer the potential viewer suspicion on who exactly this show is aiming to attract. Coupled with the fact that most clients seem to be male, and the only two active dolls introduced are females, one’s suspicions can only grow.